Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
DSCL qualified as a Governmental Authority because it was a government-established special purpose vehicle with 90% or more governmental equity/control and was set up to implement urban local body functions. Its services for the Smart City/ESCO water-supply project to UJS were exempt under Serial No. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because water supply is a Twelfth Schedule municipal function. The question whether the tripartite arrangement created two distinct supplies was held not maintainable within the questions raised. DSCL was also held not to be a pure agent under Rule 33, so the contractor-related amounts formed part of the value of supply.
DSCL qualified as a Governmental Authority because it was a government-established special purpose vehicle with 90% or more governmental equity/control and was set up to implement urban local body functions. Its services for the Smart City/ESCO water-supply project to UJS were exempt under Serial No. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because water supply is a Twelfth Schedule municipal function. The question whether the tripartite arrangement created two distinct supplies was held not maintainable within the questions raised. DSCL was also held not to be a pure agent under Rule 33, so the contractor-related amounts formed part of the value of supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
