Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
DSCL qualified as a Governmental Authority because it was a government-established special purpose vehicle with 90% or more governmental equity/control and was set up to implement urban local body functions. Its services for the Smart City/ESCO water-supply project to UJS were exempt under Serial No. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because water supply is a Twelfth Schedule municipal function. The question whether the tripartite arrangement created two distinct supplies was held not maintainable within the questions raised. DSCL was also held not to be a pure agent under Rule 33, so the contractor-related amounts formed part of the value of supply.
DSCL qualified as a Governmental Authority because it was a government-established special purpose vehicle with 90% or more governmental equity/control and was set up to implement urban local body functions. Its services for the Smart City/ESCO water-supply project to UJS were exempt under Serial No. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because water supply is a Twelfth Schedule municipal function. The question whether the tripartite arrangement created two distinct supplies was held not maintainable within the questions raised. DSCL was also held not to be a pure agent under Rule 33, so the contractor-related amounts formed part of the value of supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
