Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Cash receipts and repayments between an assessee and close family members, including related family entities, were not treated as loans or deposits under the relevant cash transaction provisions. The Tribunal noted that the family relationship was undisputed and applied the Gujarat High Court ratio in Dr. Rajaram L. Akhani to hold that such intra-family transactions do not fall within the mischief of the cash loan and deposit restrictions. As the statutory foundation for penalty failed, the penalties for cash acceptance and cash repayment were unsustainable and were deleted; both appeals were allowed.
Cash receipts and repayments between an assessee and close family members, including related family entities, were not treated as loans or deposits under the relevant cash transaction provisions. The Tribunal noted that the family relationship was undisputed and applied the Gujarat High Court ratio in Dr. Rajaram L. Akhani to hold that such intra-family transactions do not fall within the mischief of the cash loan and deposit restrictions. As the statutory foundation for penalty failed, the penalties for cash acceptance and cash repayment were unsustainable and were deleted; both appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.