Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Non-deduction of tax on leave fare concession payments made while binding interim directions of the Madras High Court were in force did not render the assessee an assessee in default. The Tribunal held that the statutory TDS obligation could not be enforced in disregard of those judicial directions, and the later Supreme Court ruling on the substantive taxability of the payments could not retrospectively create default liability for that earlier period. The demands under section 201(1) and section 201(1A) were deleted. Once the default demand failed, the consequential penalty under section 271C also could not survive and was deleted.
Non-deduction of tax on leave fare concession payments made while binding interim directions of the Madras High Court were in force did not render the assessee an assessee in default. The Tribunal held that the statutory TDS obligation could not be enforced in disregard of those judicial directions, and the later Supreme Court ruling on the substantive taxability of the payments could not retrospectively create default liability for that earlier period. The demands under section 201(1) and section 201(1A) were deleted. Once the default demand failed, the consequential penalty under section 271C also could not survive and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
