Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Non-deduction of tax on leave fare concession payments made while binding interim directions of the Madras High Court were in force did not render the assessee an assessee in default. The Tribunal held that the statutory TDS obligation could not be enforced in disregard of those judicial directions, and the later Supreme Court ruling on the substantive taxability of the payments could not retrospectively create default liability for that earlier period. The demands under section 201(1) and section 201(1A) were deleted. Once the default demand failed, the consequential penalty under section 271C also could not survive and was deleted.
Non-deduction of tax on leave fare concession payments made while binding interim directions of the Madras High Court were in force did not render the assessee an assessee in default. The Tribunal held that the statutory TDS obligation could not be enforced in disregard of those judicial directions, and the later Supreme Court ruling on the substantive taxability of the payments could not retrospectively create default liability for that earlier period. The demands under section 201(1) and section 201(1A) were deleted. Once the default demand failed, the consequential penalty under section 271C also could not survive and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
