Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-deduction of tax on leave fare concession payments made while binding interim directions of the Madras High Court were in force did not render the assessee an assessee in default. The Tribunal held that the statutory TDS obligation could not be enforced in disregard of those judicial directions, and the later Supreme Court ruling on the substantive taxability of the payments could not retrospectively create default liability for that earlier period. The demands under section 201(1) and section 201(1A) were deleted. Once the default demand failed, the consequential penalty under section 271C also could not survive and was deleted.
Non-deduction of tax on leave fare concession payments made while binding interim directions of the Madras High Court were in force did not render the assessee an assessee in default. The Tribunal held that the statutory TDS obligation could not be enforced in disregard of those judicial directions, and the later Supreme Court ruling on the substantive taxability of the payments could not retrospectively create default liability for that earlier period. The demands under section 201(1) and section 201(1A) were deleted. Once the default demand failed, the consequential penalty under section 271C also could not survive and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.