Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Salary reimbursement for seconded employees was held not to be fee for technical services where, during secondment, the employees were released from the foreign entity, worked solely for the Indian company, and remained under its exclusive control, direction and supervision. The Indian company bore the salary cost, could evaluate, discipline, suspend and terminate the secondees, and tax was deducted in India on the salary payments. A small administrative disbursement made in Japan and reimbursed without markup did not change the character of the payment. The Tribunal therefore deleted the FTS addition and distinguished Centrica India Offshore on the facts; the same conclusion applied to the connected appeals.
Salary reimbursement for seconded employees was held not to be fee for technical services where, during secondment, the employees were released from the foreign entity, worked solely for the Indian company, and remained under its exclusive control, direction and supervision. The Indian company bore the salary cost, could evaluate, discipline, suspend and terminate the secondees, and tax was deducted in India on the salary payments. A small administrative disbursement made in Japan and reimbursed without markup did not change the character of the payment. The Tribunal therefore deleted the FTS addition and distinguished Centrica India Offshore on the facts; the same conclusion applied to the connected appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.