Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
A reassessment notice issued after expiry of three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required sanction from the higher specified authority under section 151(ii); approval from the Principal Commissioner was insufficient. The Tribunal held that section 151 distinguishes between notices within three years and those issued later, and non-compliance with the correct sanction requirement goes to jurisdiction. The notice under section 148 was therefore invalid, and the assessment framed pursuant to it was quashed.
A reassessment notice issued after expiry of three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required sanction from the higher specified authority under section 151(ii); approval from the Principal Commissioner was insufficient. The Tribunal held that section 151 distinguishes between notices within three years and those issued later, and non-compliance with the correct sanction requirement goes to jurisdiction. The notice under section 148 was therefore invalid, and the assessment framed pursuant to it was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
