Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A short-deduction demand on purchase of immovable property was held unsustainable where the seller's PAN was later regularised through Aadhaar linkage within the CBDT circular period, so the higher TDS rate for an inoperative PAN did not apply and the related demand under section 200A had to be deleted. Independently, the proviso to section 201(1) protected the deductor because the seller had filed the return, declared the capital gains, and paid tax on the transaction, so the deductor could not be treated as an assessee-in-default. The Tribunal also noted that similar relief had already been granted in the co-owner's case.
A short-deduction demand on purchase of immovable property was held unsustainable where the seller's PAN was later regularised through Aadhaar linkage within the CBDT circular period, so the higher TDS rate for an inoperative PAN did not apply and the related demand under section 200A had to be deleted. Independently, the proviso to section 201(1) protected the deductor because the seller had filed the return, declared the capital gains, and paid tax on the transaction, so the deductor could not be treated as an assessee-in-default. The Tribunal also noted that similar relief had already been granted in the co-owner's case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.