Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3981 to 4000 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An interlocutory direction requiring the Committee of Creditors to reconsider approval of the appellant's appointment as Resolution Professional under the insolvency code was treated as precautionary and facilitative, not as a final adjudication of rights. Because the Committee of Creditors had yet to independently examine the effect of earlier orders on its approval, the appellant's entitlement had not attained finality. No interference was warranted at that stage, and the matter was left to reconsideration on its own merits.
An interlocutory direction requiring the Committee of Creditors to reconsider approval of the appellant's appointment as Resolution Professional under the insolvency code was treated as precautionary and facilitative, not as a final adjudication of rights. Because the Committee of Creditors had yet to independently examine the effect of earlier orders on its approval, the appellant's entitlement had not attained finality. No interference was warranted at that stage, and the matter was left to reconsideration on its own merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
