Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Writ jurisdiction may extend to a private bank when it acts as an Authorised Dealer under the FEMA-RBI framework and its refusal to process foreign exchange transactions is challenged as arbitrary. The article notes that contractual banking dealings do not exclude judicial review where a public law element exists, and that a clean-hands objection based on alleged suppression will not automatically bar a petition if the disputed facts are part of the main controversy. It also explains that the bank could require enhanced due diligence and refuse processing when later material raised sanctions-related concerns, with the writ court declining to reappreciate disputed commercial facts and no interference being made under Article 226.
Writ jurisdiction may extend to a private bank when it acts as an Authorised Dealer under the FEMA-RBI framework and its refusal to process foreign exchange transactions is challenged as arbitrary. The article notes that contractual banking dealings do not exclude judicial review where a public law element exists, and that a clean-hands objection based on alleged suppression will not automatically bar a petition if the disputed facts are part of the main controversy. It also explains that the bank could require enhanced due diligence and refuse processing when later material raised sanctions-related concerns, with the writ court declining to reappreciate disputed commercial facts and no interference being made under Article 226.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
