Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Under FEMA, the meaning of "person resident in India" turned on residence for more than 182 days in the preceding financial year read with the purpose of stay. Because the respondents were in India on business visas and were carrying on business, they did not fall within the exclusionary limb of the definition, so they were treated as residents in India. As a result, the regulations governing persons resident outside India did not apply to their purchase of immovable property, and the Tribunal's setting aside of confiscation and penalty was upheld; no perversity in its findings was shown. The connected writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Under FEMA, the meaning of "person resident in India" turned on residence for more than 182 days in the preceding financial year read with the purpose of stay. Because the respondents were in India on business visas and were carrying on business, they did not fall within the exclusionary limb of the definition, so they were treated as residents in India. As a result, the regulations governing persons resident outside India did not apply to their purchase of immovable property, and the Tribunal's setting aside of confiscation and penalty was upheld; no perversity in its findings was shown. The connected writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
