Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Under FEMA, the meaning of "person resident in India" turned on residence for more than 182 days in the preceding financial year read with the purpose of stay. Because the respondents were in India on business visas and were carrying on business, they did not fall within the exclusionary limb of the definition, so they were treated as residents in India. As a result, the regulations governing persons resident outside India did not apply to their purchase of immovable property, and the Tribunal's setting aside of confiscation and penalty was upheld; no perversity in its findings was shown. The connected writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Under FEMA, the meaning of "person resident in India" turned on residence for more than 182 days in the preceding financial year read with the purpose of stay. Because the respondents were in India on business visas and were carrying on business, they did not fall within the exclusionary limb of the definition, so they were treated as residents in India. As a result, the regulations governing persons resident outside India did not apply to their purchase of immovable property, and the Tribunal's setting aside of confiscation and penalty was upheld; no perversity in its findings was shown. The connected writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
