Unsubstantiated exempt agricultural income claim sustains concealment penalty after disclosure only on departmental detection and no bona fide evidenc...
An order-in-original passed against a deceased sole proprietor was held vulnerable because no notice was issued to the legal representative before further proceedings. The High Court treated the argument that the proprietary concern continued as immaterial, and observed that once the proprietor dies, the department must at least proceed against the legal representative. The impugned order was quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
An order-in-original passed against a deceased sole proprietor was held vulnerable because no notice was issued to the legal representative before further proceedings. The High Court treated the argument that the proprietary concern continued as immaterial, and observed that once the proprietor dies, the department must at least proceed against the legal representative. The impugned order was quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.