Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
An order-in-original passed against a deceased sole proprietor was held vulnerable because no notice was issued to the legal representative before further proceedings. The High Court treated the argument that the proprietary concern continued as immaterial, and observed that once the proprietor dies, the department must at least proceed against the legal representative. The impugned order was quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
An order-in-original passed against a deceased sole proprietor was held vulnerable because no notice was issued to the legal representative before further proceedings. The High Court treated the argument that the proprietary concern continued as immaterial, and observed that once the proprietor dies, the department must at least proceed against the legal representative. The impugned order was quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
