Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Refund claim arising from EPCG-linked procurement was rejected because the supplier had shown the supply under general turnover instead of deemed exports, without giving the claimant an opportunity to produce supporting material. The Court treated the problem as a curable classification error and directed that the claim be reconsidered on merits if proper documents were furnished, including a Chartered Accountant's certificate. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration upon submission of the required representation and evidence.
Refund claim arising from EPCG-linked procurement was rejected because the supplier had shown the supply under general turnover instead of deemed exports, without giving the claimant an opportunity to produce supporting material. The Court treated the problem as a curable classification error and directed that the claim be reconsidered on merits if proper documents were furnished, including a Chartered Accountant's certificate. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration upon submission of the required representation and evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.