Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Refund claim arising from EPCG-linked procurement was rejected because the supplier had shown the supply under general turnover instead of deemed exports, without giving the claimant an opportunity to produce supporting material. The Court treated the problem as a curable classification error and directed that the claim be reconsidered on merits if proper documents were furnished, including a Chartered Accountant's certificate. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration upon submission of the required representation and evidence.
Refund claim arising from EPCG-linked procurement was rejected because the supplier had shown the supply under general turnover instead of deemed exports, without giving the claimant an opportunity to produce supporting material. The Court treated the problem as a curable classification error and directed that the claim be reconsidered on merits if proper documents were furnished, including a Chartered Accountant's certificate. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration upon submission of the required representation and evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.