Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Refund claim arising from EPCG-linked procurement was rejected because the supplier had shown the supply under general turnover instead of deemed exports, without giving the claimant an opportunity to produce supporting material. The Court treated the problem as a curable classification error and directed that the claim be reconsidered on merits if proper documents were furnished, including a Chartered Accountant's certificate. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration upon submission of the required representation and evidence.
Refund claim arising from EPCG-linked procurement was rejected because the supplier had shown the supply under general turnover instead of deemed exports, without giving the claimant an opportunity to produce supporting material. The Court treated the problem as a curable classification error and directed that the claim be reconsidered on merits if proper documents were furnished, including a Chartered Accountant's certificate. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration upon submission of the required representation and evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.