Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The statutory right of appeal is order-specific: an assessee may challenge only the order that creates a grievance, and an intimation under section 143(1) and an assessment under section 143(3) operate independently. Where the later assessment merely accepts the income already determined under section 143(1) and makes no fresh addition or other adverse variation, no grievance arises from that assessment order and no appeal lies against it. The Tribunal rejected the doctrine of merger, holding that a challenge to adjustments made under section 143(1) must be taken against that order itself, not indirectly through an appeal against the later assessment. The dismissal of the appeal was therefore upheld.
The statutory right of appeal is order-specific: an assessee may challenge only the order that creates a grievance, and an intimation under section 143(1) and an assessment under section 143(3) operate independently. Where the later assessment merely accepts the income already determined under section 143(1) and makes no fresh addition or other adverse variation, no grievance arises from that assessment order and no appeal lies against it. The Tribunal rejected the doctrine of merger, holding that a challenge to adjustments made under section 143(1) must be taken against that order itself, not indirectly through an appeal against the later assessment. The dismissal of the appeal was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
