Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The statutory right of appeal is order-specific: an assessee may challenge only the order that creates a grievance, and an intimation under section 143(1) and an assessment under section 143(3) operate independently. Where the later assessment merely accepts the income already determined under section 143(1) and makes no fresh addition or other adverse variation, no grievance arises from that assessment order and no appeal lies against it. The Tribunal rejected the doctrine of merger, holding that a challenge to adjustments made under section 143(1) must be taken against that order itself, not indirectly through an appeal against the later assessment. The dismissal of the appeal was therefore upheld.
The statutory right of appeal is order-specific: an assessee may challenge only the order that creates a grievance, and an intimation under section 143(1) and an assessment under section 143(3) operate independently. Where the later assessment merely accepts the income already determined under section 143(1) and makes no fresh addition or other adverse variation, no grievance arises from that assessment order and no appeal lies against it. The Tribunal rejected the doctrine of merger, holding that a challenge to adjustments made under section 143(1) must be taken against that order itself, not indirectly through an appeal against the later assessment. The dismissal of the appeal was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
