Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Strict compliance with post-import conditions governed exemption under Notification No. 65/88-Cus.: cancellation of the DGHS certificates for failure to provide free treatment and reserve beds for the prescribed patient categories meant the importer lost the essential qualification for duty exemption, and recovery of duty foregone was upheld. The alternative claims under Notification No. 208/81-Cus. also failed because the separately imported Angioscope was only a component part, while the cardioscope and cardiac monitor entry was expressly excluded from the claimed benefit. On breach of the exemption conditions, the goods were liable to confiscation under Section 111(o), and the demand, redemption fine and penalty were sustained.
Strict compliance with post-import conditions governed exemption under Notification No. 65/88-Cus.: cancellation of the DGHS certificates for failure to provide free treatment and reserve beds for the prescribed patient categories meant the importer lost the essential qualification for duty exemption, and recovery of duty foregone was upheld. The alternative claims under Notification No. 208/81-Cus. also failed because the separately imported Angioscope was only a component part, while the cardioscope and cardiac monitor entry was expressly excluded from the claimed benefit. On breach of the exemption conditions, the goods were liable to confiscation under Section 111(o), and the demand, redemption fine and penalty were sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
