Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Natural justice justified writ interference where additional objections and supporting documents were refused in insolvency proceedings after the corporate debtor had filed its original reply. The Tribunal had power to receive subsequent pleadings with leave under the procedural rules, read with its inherent powers, and the refusal on the ground that no such provision existed was unsustainable. The short time for the original reply explained the later filing, and the alternative-remedy objection did not bar relief because the refusal was procedurally unfair. The impugned order was set aside and the Tribunal was directed to consider the additional objections and documents.
Natural justice justified writ interference where additional objections and supporting documents were refused in insolvency proceedings after the corporate debtor had filed its original reply. The Tribunal had power to receive subsequent pleadings with leave under the procedural rules, read with its inherent powers, and the refusal on the ground that no such provision existed was unsustainable. The short time for the original reply explained the later filing, and the alternative-remedy objection did not bar relief because the refusal was procedurally unfair. The impugned order was set aside and the Tribunal was directed to consider the additional objections and documents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.