Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
GST registration cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns may be restored where the registered person approaches the proper authority and complies with the proviso to Rule 22(4) by furnishing pending returns and paying tax dues, interest, penalty and late fee. The text states that restoration can be considered in accordance with law, with an application made within the stipulated time. It also notes that the limitation period under Section 73(10) is to run from the date of the order, except for financial year 2024-25, which is to be governed separately under the return-related provisions.
GST registration cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns may be restored where the registered person approaches the proper authority and complies with the proviso to Rule 22(4) by furnishing pending returns and paying tax dues, interest, penalty and late fee. The text states that restoration can be considered in accordance with law, with an application made within the stipulated time. It also notes that the limitation period under Section 73(10) is to run from the date of the order, except for financial year 2024-25, which is to be governed separately under the return-related provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.