Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
A GST show cause notice described only as system generated, without naming or identifying the office of the issuing authority, was held invalid because statutory power to issue notice vests in the competent officer, not in the system. An advisory on notices or orders without digital signatures could not cure that defect. Since the notice was dehors the Act and Rules, the consequential order cancelling GST registration could not survive, and the cancellation order was quashed.
A GST show cause notice described only as system generated, without naming or identifying the office of the issuing authority, was held invalid because statutory power to issue notice vests in the competent officer, not in the system. An advisory on notices or orders without digital signatures could not cure that defect. Since the notice was dehors the Act and Rules, the consequential order cancelling GST registration could not survive, and the cancellation order was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.