Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
