Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
