Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5761 to 5780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
