Charitable registration turns on predominant purpose and genuine activities, while incidental fees and related-party rent require supporting adverse m...
MAT book-profit adjustments exclude disallowances for exempt-income expenditure and demerger expenditure unless expressly listed under the statutory c...
Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
GST on sub-contracted works contracts was treated as chargeable at 18%, and that rate was not reopened in the present writ petitions. The sub-contractor was held entitled to reimbursement of the differential tax from the main contractor on the same basis as the earlier order, and was allowed to issue post-supply debit notes; debit notes issued after 01.01.2021 were to be recognised in the year of issue under Circular No.160/16/2021-GST. The main contractor was directed to pay the differential amount within six weeks, while the sub-contractor's statutory liability to pay tax to the department remained unaffected. The refund claim based on alleged double payment was left to departmental reconciliation.
GST on sub-contracted works contracts was treated as chargeable at 18%, and that rate was not reopened in the present writ petitions. The sub-contractor was held entitled to reimbursement of the differential tax from the main contractor on the same basis as the earlier order, and was allowed to issue post-supply debit notes; debit notes issued after 01.01.2021 were to be recognised in the year of issue under Circular No.160/16/2021-GST. The main contractor was directed to pay the differential amount within six weeks, while the sub-contractor's statutory liability to pay tax to the department remained unaffected. The refund claim based on alleged double payment was left to departmental reconciliation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.