Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Assignment of Leasehold Rights is a transfer of immovable property, not a taxable supply under GST; demand quashed.
    Locus to challenge show cause notice denied; petition dismissed and detention/confiscation proceedings left undisturbed.
    Seizure of Cash cannot be upheld absent specific evidentiary linkage; release ordered pending further proof and pleadings.
    Extended limitation for reassessment not triggered by procedural remand; ordinary limitation applied and reassessment held time barred.
    Irrevocability of public charitable trusts arises by law; lack of an express clause cannot justify registration rejection.
    Service by Email: recorded email addresses validate notices but pandemic excuse may condone appeal delay, subject to deposit.
    Slump Sale qualifies where consideration is lump sum without asset wise valuation; capital gains computed under special net worth rule.
    Depreciation on Goodwill denied where not capitalised; SEZ unit loss set off remitted for AO verification and recomputation.
    Reopening of assessment invalid where approval rests on erroneous facts; onus under section 68 shifts to AO to rebut documentary proof.
    Allowability of business expenditure: captive power costs upheld as deductible; Rule 8D disallowance limited to exempt income.
    Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
    Indexed cost of improvement: 80% of claimed improvement allowed despite incomplete proof, AO directed to recompute deduction.
    Audi Alteram Partem breach invalidates disallowance where authorities ignore available documentary evidence; addition set aside.
    Electronic chat evidence: WhatsApp messages alone cannot prove unexplained investment; corroborative seized material and statements required.
    Jurisdiction under Section 153C invalid for lack of incriminating material; additions deleted and earlier years quashed.
    Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
    Mandatory Signature Requirement: unsigned income tax notices are invalid and cannot sustain reassessment proceedings under law.
    Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
    Improper import standard: invalid inspection certificates alone do not justify confiscation; penalties require proof of abetment mens rea.
    Presumption of smuggling: possession, recovery and an un retracted admission sustain confiscation when lawful origin is not proved.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Anti-profiteering on cinema tickets required the supplier to...

Anti-profiteering on cinema tickets: GST benefit had to be passed on, with profiteered sums deposited in consumer welfare funds

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST June 13, 2026 Case Laws AT
Anti-profiteering on cinema tickets required the supplier to pass on GST rate reduction through a commensurate reduction in ticket prices, and the burden to justify any higher pricing lay on the supplier. The Tribunal rejected the defence based on licensing control because no contemporaneous material showed any request, permission, or order for the relevant period, and the respondent's explanations were contradictory. As the DGAP methodology and calculations were not disputed, the profiteering computation was accepted and the amount for 01.01.2019 to 30.06.2019 was held recoverable with interest. Because the recipients were not identifiable, the amount had to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Funds, and penalty was declined since the penal provision applied only prospectively from 01.01.2020.

Topics

Acts Income Tax