Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
DSIR-certified capital scientific research expenditure qualified for weighted deduction at 200%, and the Tribunal directed allowance of the balance deduction where only 100% had been given on the certified amount. For uncertified capital expenditure, it held that once the expenditure was actually incurred for scientific research and that fact was undisputed, denial of weighted deduction did not bar a normal deduction under section 35(1)(iv); the Assessing Officer was directed to verify and allow it. On transfer pricing, the deletion of the adjustment was sustained because no defect was shown in the assessee's study, third-party finished-goods margins were not a proper benchmark for inter-unit transfers, and no fresh material distinguished the year from earlier years. The consequential section 80IC relief was also upheld.
DSIR-certified capital scientific research expenditure qualified for weighted deduction at 200%, and the Tribunal directed allowance of the balance deduction where only 100% had been given on the certified amount. For uncertified capital expenditure, it held that once the expenditure was actually incurred for scientific research and that fact was undisputed, denial of weighted deduction did not bar a normal deduction under section 35(1)(iv); the Assessing Officer was directed to verify and allow it. On transfer pricing, the deletion of the adjustment was sustained because no defect was shown in the assessee's study, third-party finished-goods margins were not a proper benchmark for inter-unit transfers, and no fresh material distinguished the year from earlier years. The consequential section 80IC relief was also upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
