Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5281 to 5300 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
DSIR-certified capital scientific research expenditure qualified for weighted deduction at 200%, and the Tribunal directed allowance of the balance deduction where only 100% had been given on the certified amount. For uncertified capital expenditure, it held that once the expenditure was actually incurred for scientific research and that fact was undisputed, denial of weighted deduction did not bar a normal deduction under section 35(1)(iv); the Assessing Officer was directed to verify and allow it. On transfer pricing, the deletion of the adjustment was sustained because no defect was shown in the assessee's study, third-party finished-goods margins were not a proper benchmark for inter-unit transfers, and no fresh material distinguished the year from earlier years. The consequential section 80IC relief was also upheld.
DSIR-certified capital scientific research expenditure qualified for weighted deduction at 200%, and the Tribunal directed allowance of the balance deduction where only 100% had been given on the certified amount. For uncertified capital expenditure, it held that once the expenditure was actually incurred for scientific research and that fact was undisputed, denial of weighted deduction did not bar a normal deduction under section 35(1)(iv); the Assessing Officer was directed to verify and allow it. On transfer pricing, the deletion of the adjustment was sustained because no defect was shown in the assessee's study, third-party finished-goods margins were not a proper benchmark for inter-unit transfers, and no fresh material distinguished the year from earlier years. The consequential section 80IC relief was also upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
