Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The Tribunal treated the dispute as covered by its earlier coordinate Bench ruling on similar facts involving alleged misuse of duty-free import authorisations and discharge of export obligations. Applying that precedent, it found no case for imposing penalties on the supporting manufacturer or the deemed export recipient under customs law, and upheld the order to the extent it had declined such penalties. The Revenue's challenge to non-imposition of penalties therefore failed.
The Tribunal treated the dispute as covered by its earlier coordinate Bench ruling on similar facts involving alleged misuse of duty-free import authorisations and discharge of export obligations. Applying that precedent, it found no case for imposing penalties on the supporting manufacturer or the deemed export recipient under customs law, and upheld the order to the extent it had declined such penalties. The Revenue's challenge to non-imposition of penalties therefore failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
