Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7221 to 7240 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A flat-booking dispute was treated as a civil and monetary controversy, not a criminal case, where the parties later mutually converted the advance into a loan. As there was no prima facie material of false inducement at the inception, the cheating and criminal breach of trust allegations were held unsustainable and the proceedings were quashed. The forgery allegations also failed because the alleged forged municipal sanction papers surfaced only years after payment, with no nexus to the initial transaction and no material showing preparation of a false document or dishonest intention. The objection based on an earlier interim order was rejected because interim protection did not bind final adjudication.
A flat-booking dispute was treated as a civil and monetary controversy, not a criminal case, where the parties later mutually converted the advance into a loan. As there was no prima facie material of false inducement at the inception, the cheating and criminal breach of trust allegations were held unsustainable and the proceedings were quashed. The forgery allegations also failed because the alleged forged municipal sanction papers surfaced only years after payment, with no nexus to the initial transaction and no material showing preparation of a false document or dishonest intention. The objection based on an earlier interim order was rejected because interim protection did not bind final adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
