NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
A flat-booking dispute was treated as a civil and monetary controversy, not a criminal case, where the parties later mutually converted the advance into a loan. As there was no prima facie material of false inducement at the inception, the cheating and criminal breach of trust allegations were held unsustainable and the proceedings were quashed. The forgery allegations also failed because the alleged forged municipal sanction papers surfaced only years after payment, with no nexus to the initial transaction and no material showing preparation of a false document or dishonest intention. The objection based on an earlier interim order was rejected because interim protection did not bind final adjudication.
A flat-booking dispute was treated as a civil and monetary controversy, not a criminal case, where the parties later mutually converted the advance into a loan. As there was no prima facie material of false inducement at the inception, the cheating and criminal breach of trust allegations were held unsustainable and the proceedings were quashed. The forgery allegations also failed because the alleged forged municipal sanction papers surfaced only years after payment, with no nexus to the initial transaction and no material showing preparation of a false document or dishonest intention. The objection based on an earlier interim order was rejected because interim protection did not bind final adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
