Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2601 to 2620 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A liquidation auction for sale of a corporate debtor as a going concern was confined to the corporate debtor on an as is where is, as is what is, whatever there is and no recourse basis, and an alleged business plan could not enlarge the sale to include subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates or other third-party assets. The text notes that such assets were not shown to form part of the liquidation estate, and the prayers for restraint against alienation and for further extension or amendment of the payment schedule were rejected. Cancellation of the bid for non-payment was upheld, but the forfeiture of deposited sums remained unresolved because the Members differed on that limited issue.
A liquidation auction for sale of a corporate debtor as a going concern was confined to the corporate debtor on an as is where is, as is what is, whatever there is and no recourse basis, and an alleged business plan could not enlarge the sale to include subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates or other third-party assets. The text notes that such assets were not shown to form part of the liquidation estate, and the prayers for restraint against alienation and for further extension or amendment of the payment schedule were rejected. Cancellation of the bid for non-payment was upheld, but the forfeiture of deposited sums remained unresolved because the Members differed on that limited issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.