Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
In cheque dishonour proceedings arising from commercial transactions, the court applied inherent jurisdiction sparingly to bring criminal proceedings to an end where the parties had voluntarily settled and continuation would serve no useful purpose. It treated offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act as compoundable, noted that the complainant had received the full amount in full and final satisfaction and that execution proceedings had been withdrawn, and found no coercion or fraud in the compromise. On that basis, the offence was compounded, the proceedings were terminated, and the sentence was modified to the period already undergone.
In cheque dishonour proceedings arising from commercial transactions, the court applied inherent jurisdiction sparingly to bring criminal proceedings to an end where the parties had voluntarily settled and continuation would serve no useful purpose. It treated offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act as compoundable, noted that the complainant had received the full amount in full and final satisfaction and that execution proceedings had been withdrawn, and found no coercion or fraud in the compromise. On that basis, the offence was compounded, the proceedings were terminated, and the sentence was modified to the period already undergone.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
