Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Where refund of unutilised input tax credit is rejected because the credit is alleged to be ineligible, the circular permits notice and recovery proceedings under the GST recovery provisions; clause 22 applies only when refund is refused for reasons other than ineligibility, so the objection based on that clause failed. The challenge to the circular was therefore rejected, while the question whether the correct recovery route was one provision or another was left open. Because the statutory second appeal had not been taken on file due to a portal glitch and the required amount had been deposited, the impugned order was kept in abeyance until disposal of the appeal, with liberty to raise all available grounds if the appeal failed.
Where refund of unutilised input tax credit is rejected because the credit is alleged to be ineligible, the circular permits notice and recovery proceedings under the GST recovery provisions; clause 22 applies only when refund is refused for reasons other than ineligibility, so the objection based on that clause failed. The challenge to the circular was therefore rejected, while the question whether the correct recovery route was one provision or another was left open. Because the statutory second appeal had not been taken on file due to a portal glitch and the required amount had been deposited, the impugned order was kept in abeyance until disposal of the appeal, with liberty to raise all available grounds if the appeal failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
