Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Indexed cost of construction and land was allowed in capital gains computation where the registered sale deed and its annexure already contained the relevant building particulars. The tribunal held that the annexure formed an integral part of the public document, so those details were not "additional evidence" requiring Rule 46A compliance. It further held that indexation under section 48 is a statutory consequence and cannot be denied on hyper-technical grounds when the material necessary to determine cost is already on record. The capital gains were therefore required to be recomputed, and treating the entire sale consideration as short-term capital gain was unsustainable.
Indexed cost of construction and land was allowed in capital gains computation where the registered sale deed and its annexure already contained the relevant building particulars. The tribunal held that the annexure formed an integral part of the public document, so those details were not "additional evidence" requiring Rule 46A compliance. It further held that indexation under section 48 is a statutory consequence and cannot be denied on hyper-technical grounds when the material necessary to determine cost is already on record. The capital gains were therefore required to be recomputed, and treating the entire sale consideration as short-term capital gain was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.