Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Profit attribution to an Indian permanent establishment in cross-border M&A deals depended on the actual functions performed by each branch. The Tribunal noted that the assessee's model first split deal revenue between origination and execution, then allocated it according to each branch's role; email evidence showed active UK team involvement in execution, and the department's acceptance of substantial origination revenue allocation to overseas branches in the same deals supported that approach. The rejection of shared execution revenue was therefore unsustainable, and the addition attributed entirely to the Indian PE was deleted. The MAT credit claim was not decided on merits and was restored for factual verification and grant in accordance with law.
Profit attribution to an Indian permanent establishment in cross-border M&A deals depended on the actual functions performed by each branch. The Tribunal noted that the assessee's model first split deal revenue between origination and execution, then allocated it according to each branch's role; email evidence showed active UK team involvement in execution, and the department's acceptance of substantial origination revenue allocation to overseas branches in the same deals supported that approach. The rejection of shared execution revenue was therefore unsustainable, and the addition attributed entirely to the Indian PE was deleted. The MAT credit claim was not decided on merits and was restored for factual verification and grant in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
