Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5281 to 5300 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing of intra-group services required fresh examination because CUP could not be applied at nil without uncontrolled comparable transactions, and the TPO had to consider the evidence and additional evidence on actual receipt and nature of services; the impugned adjustment was therefore set aside and remanded. On unabsorbed depreciation, the Tribunal held that depreciation relating to earlier years, not absorbed by financial year 2002-03, merged with subsequent-year depreciation and was not subject to the earlier eight-year restriction after the amendment to section 32(2); the assessee's claim for carry forward and set-off beyond eight years was allowed and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Transfer pricing of intra-group services required fresh examination because CUP could not be applied at nil without uncontrolled comparable transactions, and the TPO had to consider the evidence and additional evidence on actual receipt and nature of services; the impugned adjustment was therefore set aside and remanded. On unabsorbed depreciation, the Tribunal held that depreciation relating to earlier years, not absorbed by financial year 2002-03, merged with subsequent-year depreciation and was not subject to the earlier eight-year restriction after the amendment to section 32(2); the assessee's claim for carry forward and set-off beyond eight years was allowed and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
