Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5761 to 5780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer of pending winding up proceedings under the statutory transfer scheme can be ordered even without a party application, because Section 434(1)(c) requires assessment of the stage of liquidation and whether it has become irreversible or irretrievable. On the facts, only possession of assets had been taken and the immovable properties remained unsold, so liquidation had not crossed that stage. The transfer order was therefore a valid exercise of jurisdiction and the challenge failed.
Transfer of pending winding up proceedings under the statutory transfer scheme can be ordered even without a party application, because Section 434(1)(c) requires assessment of the stage of liquidation and whether it has become irreversible or irretrievable. On the facts, only possession of assets had been taken and the immovable properties remained unsold, so liquidation had not crossed that stage. The transfer order was therefore a valid exercise of jurisdiction and the challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.