Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Transfer of pending winding up proceedings under the statutory transfer scheme can be ordered even without a party application, because Section 434(1)(c) requires assessment of the stage of liquidation and whether it has become irreversible or irretrievable. On the facts, only possession of assets had been taken and the immovable properties remained unsold, so liquidation had not crossed that stage. The transfer order was therefore a valid exercise of jurisdiction and the challenge failed.
Transfer of pending winding up proceedings under the statutory transfer scheme can be ordered even without a party application, because Section 434(1)(c) requires assessment of the stage of liquidation and whether it has become irreversible or irretrievable. On the facts, only possession of assets had been taken and the immovable properties remained unsold, so liquidation had not crossed that stage. The transfer order was therefore a valid exercise of jurisdiction and the challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.