Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer of pending winding up proceedings under the statutory transfer scheme can be ordered even without a party application, because Section 434(1)(c) requires assessment of the stage of liquidation and whether it has become irreversible or irretrievable. On the facts, only possession of assets had been taken and the immovable properties remained unsold, so liquidation had not crossed that stage. The transfer order was therefore a valid exercise of jurisdiction and the challenge failed.
Transfer of pending winding up proceedings under the statutory transfer scheme can be ordered even without a party application, because Section 434(1)(c) requires assessment of the stage of liquidation and whether it has become irreversible or irretrievable. On the facts, only possession of assets had been taken and the immovable properties remained unsold, so liquidation had not crossed that stage. The transfer order was therefore a valid exercise of jurisdiction and the challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.