Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Expiry of an insolvency professional's authorisation on attaining 70 years did not end an ongoing assignment, because Regulation 7A's proviso preserved assignments already in progress when authorisation expired; the Bankruptcy Trustee was allowed to continue and complete the work. The challenge to removal on that ground was rejected. The challenge to extension of the liquidation period was also dismissed because the extension had already expired by the time the appeal was heard, and interference would have been academic; the decision to seek extension had been treated as valid. Both appeals were dismissed.
Expiry of an insolvency professional's authorisation on attaining 70 years did not end an ongoing assignment, because Regulation 7A's proviso preserved assignments already in progress when authorisation expired; the Bankruptcy Trustee was allowed to continue and complete the work. The challenge to removal on that ground was rejected. The challenge to extension of the liquidation period was also dismissed because the extension had already expired by the time the appeal was heard, and interference would have been academic; the decision to seek extension had been treated as valid. Both appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.