Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Expiry of an insolvency professional's authorisation on attaining 70 years did not end an ongoing assignment, because Regulation 7A's proviso preserved assignments already in progress when authorisation expired; the Bankruptcy Trustee was allowed to continue and complete the work. The challenge to removal on that ground was rejected. The challenge to extension of the liquidation period was also dismissed because the extension had already expired by the time the appeal was heard, and interference would have been academic; the decision to seek extension had been treated as valid. Both appeals were dismissed.
Expiry of an insolvency professional's authorisation on attaining 70 years did not end an ongoing assignment, because Regulation 7A's proviso preserved assignments already in progress when authorisation expired; the Bankruptcy Trustee was allowed to continue and complete the work. The challenge to removal on that ground was rejected. The challenge to extension of the liquidation period was also dismissed because the extension had already expired by the time the appeal was heard, and interference would have been academic; the decision to seek extension had been treated as valid. Both appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.