Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Recovery by bank account attachment under the A.P.V.A.T. Act cannot proceed without proof of service of the show-cause notices and assessment orders. The High Court found that the respondents produced no material showing service, and the asserted affixture after returned postal service was unsupported by proof. In the absence of demonstrated service, it held that the assessment orders had not been served on the petitioner, set aside the bank account attachment, and directed fresh service of the assessment orders on counsel, to be treated as service on the petitioner. The petitioner was left free to pursue statutory remedies and seek stay in accordance with law.
Recovery by bank account attachment under the A.P.V.A.T. Act cannot proceed without proof of service of the show-cause notices and assessment orders. The High Court found that the respondents produced no material showing service, and the asserted affixture after returned postal service was unsupported by proof. In the absence of demonstrated service, it held that the assessment orders had not been served on the petitioner, set aside the bank account attachment, and directed fresh service of the assessment orders on counsel, to be treated as service on the petitioner. The petitioner was left free to pursue statutory remedies and seek stay in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.