Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
IGST refund on exports could not be denied merely because the exporter had taken higher duty drawback, since the rejection rested on Circular No. 37/2018-Cus, which had already been found inconsistent with the governing rules. The HC held that an executive circular cannot override statutory provisions or binding precedent, and the claim had to be examined under the applicable rules rather than the circular. The rejection order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after granting the exporter a reasonable hearing.
IGST refund on exports could not be denied merely because the exporter had taken higher duty drawback, since the rejection rested on Circular No. 37/2018-Cus, which had already been found inconsistent with the governing rules. The HC held that an executive circular cannot override statutory provisions or binding precedent, and the claim had to be examined under the applicable rules rather than the circular. The rejection order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after granting the exporter a reasonable hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.