Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment cannot proceed on the assumption that no return was filed once the assessee has in fact filed a return pursuant to notice under section 142(1); a later corrigendum that merely records the return without correcting the basis does not cure the foundational error, so the draft assessment order requires reconsideration and fresh proceedings may be taken in accordance with law. The text also notes that, for computing reassessment limitation under section 153(2), the time spent in a writ petition with interim protection before expiry of the period may be excluded, allowing the Department to proceed afresh after the impugned order is set aside.
Reassessment cannot proceed on the assumption that no return was filed once the assessee has in fact filed a return pursuant to notice under section 142(1); a later corrigendum that merely records the return without correcting the basis does not cure the foundational error, so the draft assessment order requires reconsideration and fresh proceedings may be taken in accordance with law. The text also notes that, for computing reassessment limitation under section 153(2), the time spent in a writ petition with interim protection before expiry of the period may be excluded, allowing the Department to proceed afresh after the impugned order is set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.