Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Deduction of tax at source under section 194J is not conclusive of professional income; tax authorities must independently examine the true nature of receipts before denying presumptive taxation under section 44AD. In the cited matter, the Tribunal set aside the appellate order and restored the case for fresh examination and de novo assessment because the receipts had been treated solely on the basis of the payer's TDS deduction, without an independent enquiry, and the assessee was to be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Deduction of tax at source under section 194J is not conclusive of professional income; tax authorities must independently examine the true nature of receipts before denying presumptive taxation under section 44AD. In the cited matter, the Tribunal set aside the appellate order and restored the case for fresh examination and de novo assessment because the receipts had been treated solely on the basis of the payer's TDS deduction, without an independent enquiry, and the assessee was to be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.