Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Income or loss arising from assets transferred without consideration to a spouse was held to fall within section 64(1)(iv) where the Department failed to show consideration or an agreement to live apart. The Tribunal applied the principle that clubbing extends to income or loss indirectly arising from the transferred asset, so the spouse's derivative trading loss could be considered in the assessee's hands if a nexus with the gifted funds existed. The view that the loss was the spouse's independent trading loss was rejected. The matter was remitted only for verification of the quantum of loss attributable to the gifted funds.
Income or loss arising from assets transferred without consideration to a spouse was held to fall within section 64(1)(iv) where the Department failed to show consideration or an agreement to live apart. The Tribunal applied the principle that clubbing extends to income or loss indirectly arising from the transferred asset, so the spouse's derivative trading loss could be considered in the assessee's hands if a nexus with the gifted funds existed. The view that the loss was the spouse's independent trading loss was rejected. The matter was remitted only for verification of the quantum of loss attributable to the gifted funds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
